I admit, the physical description makes me stumble a lot more easily than a bio or anything else, because I can pretend not to know a bio or whatnot, but I'm supposed to picture the character as they are in their description, and if that description breaks my brain, it does actually kinda breaks my immersion.
So, a couple of things I'd really wish people would keep in mind when writing their physical description:
More...
1. Height, Weight and Body Type: That Disbelief Isn't Going To Suspend Itself
I'm not asking for hyperrealism, here -- this is, after all, a game where a 3ft Gnome will hit exactly as hard as a 7ft Tauren, as long as they're the same level and wearing the same gear. And frankly, given how often I've seen "realism" used as an excuse for sexism ("Women aren't as strong as man, therefore they can't be warriors and definitely can't wield two-handers!") and other bigotry, I'm actually rather leery of calls for realism, these days. Besides, I'm a fantasy fan; my disbelief-suspending muscles are well-developed.
But suspension of disbelief only goes so far, and I get very cranky when I painfully drop my disbelief on my toes because someone forgot that swinging a sword/hammer (with or without a shield) around all day builds muscle. Yes, even if you're a girl. No, I don't care if you think bulky muscles on a female character are ugly, or "unrealistic," or whatever. It's going to happen. Sure, depending on your genetics and build and gender, the degree of bulkiness is going to vary. But a warrior or pally who's made it to Outlands, let alone Northrend, isn't going to be "slender," people, and even a newly-minted pally is going to be more than just "athletic and perhaps a little on the muscular side".
Furthermore, if you're going to give people an exact height and weight, please think about what those numbers mean. Don't just throw out what you think is a "normal"/"slender" height/weight proportion, because first of all, what we think of as "normal" often isn't, thank you mainstream media, and secondly, muscles weigh more than fat. What this means is that someone who is the same size as I am, but is muscular instead of my, er, "padded" build, is going to weight more than I do. It means that when I see things likethe two images in this paragraph, I'm picturing two very skinny individuals.
Both of them have a BMI of 18/18.5, which is literally on the border of being underweight. Doesn't sound like they're likely to have a lot of muscles on them, does it? You see why I have trouble picturing either of them as paladins, swinging a hammer around for great justice.
And don't even get me started on this Draenei Death Knight. That's a BMI of 14.9. Which, yes, exists out here in the real world as well -- my youngest brother is around that BMI, for example. My brother is also a skinny-assed freak, and I cannot imagine him trying to wield a big two-handed sword while wearing plate. And I've seen a number of Draenei around with racially semi-appropriate heights and human-standard "average" weights, which makes me wonder if this is a racial ability I've not heard of yet. Do Draenei have hollow bones filled with helium or something? *throws hands*Look, generally speaking, I'm extremely sceptical of BMI as a measurment, but when you're picuring your character's height and weight, you could do worse than to calculate their BMI, keeping in mind that warriors, paladins, Death Knights, and really, most heavy melee classes, are likely to have a BMI in the mid- to upper twenties at least. (Which, yes, is officially "overweight," which is in fact one of the problems with the BMI system. But you can use it to your advantage here.) For non-melee classes, this is a good website to see what a certain height/weight ratio actually looks like.
And while you're thinking about height and weight and whatnot, think about how those would fit your character, and think about the vast, wild variations that exist in body types out here in the real world as well. Melee classes will be muscular, logically, but that doesn't mean they're necessarily tall, or that they have no body fat at all. One of the physically strongest women I know is also fat. I've known a number of guys in my life who were physically very fit and strong, but still had a beer gut.
On the other end of the spectrum, caster classes are very unlikely to be bulked up and muscled out, unless they spend their days in the gym rather than questing. Yet it's rare to see a skinny male caster, and even rarer to see a fat caster of either gender, with the possibly exception of the dwarves.
And speaking of rarites, I've spent the last several weeks clicking on every RP profile I came across, and I noticed something disturbing. Number of human females taller than my 5'7" warrior alt: zero. Number of human males shorter than my 5'6" priest: ditto. The hell people?
I mean, I know what the hell, of course -- conciously or not, people often create characters that adhere to the beauty ideal at least in most ways, and the western beauty ideal says men should be tall and women should not be tall, but really, 5'7"? Not that fucking tall. And also, let's talk about that beauty thing, shall we?
2. Beauty: Still In The Eye Of The Beholder
I've been playing on an RP server for a little over a month, and I'm already sick to the teeth of physical descriptions telling me how beautiful a character is, with her petite build and her slender curves and her azure eyes and blah blah blah, or how handsome this other character is, all tall and muscled and strong-jawed and whatever and -- AUGH! *hairpull* No! Tell me what your character looks like, and I will decide wether I/my character would think this person is good-looking. Because believe it or not, beauty is not universal.
For one thing, "beauty" is likely to vary wildly depending on the race of the observer. Humans may look at a girl's breasts and ass, for example, as indicators of beauty, but dwarves are probably more likely to appreciate strong arms in either gender, I suspect, a quick jaunt through wowwiki has given me the theory that a gnome's primary beauty is in their hair, and given that the Nelves' warriors have traditionally been female, I doubt they share the female beauty ideal of petite and slender and "elegant".
For that matter, even within the same race/culture, people don't all share the same tastes. Not every character is going to find your character stunningly beautiful or handsome, and even if they do se her as attractive on an "objective" level (i.e. measured against the beauty standard of their culture), that doesn't mean they're necessarily attracted to them. And yes, dammit, this is a personal pet peeve for me. I like my women tall and big and bossy and, er, non-blonde. My priest likes tall blondes who can swing a hammer with style. Neither of us would be all that attracted to a 5'4" petite, slender woman, and we'd both appreciate it if you'd stop telling us we should be.
3. Details: Less Is More
Okay, I admit, this is in part a personal preference. I don't tend to get very clear descriptions of my characters -- usually, I (and my readers/RP-partners) are lucky to get a general height and build, and maybe hair and eye colour. I suspect this is largely because I have a hard time recognising/remembering faces in real life as well.
Which is why it baffles me when people describe a character in three paragraphs of detail, because ... really? You expect someone to notice all that at first sight? Because even people who are more observant than I am really aren't going to notice your character has, say, a large scar on the back of his shoulder. No, really.
And if you must have a three paragraph description, rather than listing a bunch of details from head to toe, try and start with a general description first, then describe more details. That would, at least, mimic the way most people notice what others look like.
4. Words: They mean Things
Put. The thesaurus. Down. Please. I'm actually begging here, folks, please don't use a £5 word when a 50p one will do. Save the expensive words for when you want to be very precise, and even then, use them sparingly -- but most of all, use them knowingly.
People have eyes, not jewel-toned "orbs". They have hair, not "tresses", and that hair is black, not "Raven". You might be aiming for poetic and non-boring, but you're hitting purple and headdesk-inducing.
Furthermore, words that are listed as synonyms in a thesaurus aren't always interchangable. "Crimson," for example, means red, yes, in that it's a very specific shade of red. A deep red with a tinge of blue, to be exact; not exactly a colour human hair comes in naturally. Neither is "scarlet," for that matter, which is a bright, blood red.
Avoid giving people the wrong image of your character (or indeed the urge to stab themselves in the face), and use the word that comes naturally, rather than the one that sounds fancy.
5. Originality: We Are All Special And Unique Snowflakes
It occured to me during my smoke break that most of my rant targets above really occur because of one big reason. Well, actually two, but the other one is that beauty ideal thing, and since this is not the feminist blog I also write at, and I promised myself I wouldn't type "patriarchy" on this blog (... oops -- er, I won't type it often?), we'll focus on the other big reason: people want their character to be unique.
Which is a perfectly fine, understandable, and even laudable goal. The problem, though, is that people seem to confuse "unique" with "stands out in a crowd", which leads to the extremely tall, the stunningly beautiful, the eye-catching scars and whatnot, and that, in turn, ironically leads to situations where I sometimes feel like Sir and my priest stand out in a crowd because we look perfectly ordinary.
I'll let you in on a secret: everyone is unique. No two people look exactly alike, not even identical twins. But by definition, only a small number of people can stand out in a crowd, and even those people are highly unlikely to actively attract noticable attention. The brother I mentioned above, the skinny-ass freak? He's tall. He's also a punk, and dresses like it, and has a dreadhawk. Does he stand out in a crowd? Sure. Do people stop and stare when he walks the streets? With one or two rude exceptions, hell no. Standing out in a crowd is not, as some people seem to think, a way to get people to RP with you, or like you, or find you interesting.
You achieve that by initiating RP yourself, by being likeable, and by being interesting.



